Ciokewicz v. Lynn Mutual Fire Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
It is contended that the facts found by the trial court do not constitute an effective cancellation of the policy issued by the defendant to the plaintiff. Upon this branch of the case the material facts are as follows: Defendant’s policy was issued January 22, 1930, application to the American Insurance Company was made upon which a policy was issued on July 22, 1931. The plaintiff left with one Vinger, agent of the American Insurance Company, his policy with the defendant company, with the understanding that it was to be sent to the defendant company. After the issuance of the policy by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oshkosh Gas Light Co. v. Germania Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Vangindertaelen v. Phenix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- McAllister v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Flatley v. Phenix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Duncan v. New York Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Southwest Baptist College, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Linn v. North Idaho District Medical Service Bureau, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.