Legal Opinion

Shirk v. Palmer

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1925No. 2679PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

Certificate to bill of exceptions, not complying with statute is insufficient. Defect is not cured by reference to transcript. Certificate of trial judge is not subject to amendment. Capurro v. Christensen, 46 Nev. 249.

Motion to dismiss appeal not taken in time should be sustained. Bill of exceptions not settled and allowed as required by law should be stricken on motion. Kingsbury v. Copren, 47 Nev. 466.

This court held in Kirman v. Johnson, 30 Nev. at 153, that "an appeal from an order or judgment, without a copy thereof in the record, is manifestly futile." By…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johns-Manville, Inc. v. Lander CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Capurro v. ChristensenNevada Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Henningsen v. Tonopah & Goldfield RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kingsbury v. CoprenNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Mellan v. MessengerNevada Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Consolazio v. SummerfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Brockman v. UllomNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Orleans Hornsilver Mining Co. v. Le Champ D'Or French Gold Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Markwell v. GrayNevada Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Caldwell v. Wedekind Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API