Taylor v. Taylor
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Coleman, C. J.:
This case was previously before us. 56 Nev. 100, 45 P.(2d) 603. At that time we ordered the bill of .exceptions remanded for correction, without prejudice to the renewal of respondents’ motions. Since its correction and return to this court, counsel for respondent has made a motion to strike portions of the record, including the bill of exceptions, and to dismiss the appeal. Counsel for appellant has made a counter motion to remand the bill of exceptions for further correction and amendment.
Counsel for respondent, in the last-mentioned motion, sets forth…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. WalserNevada Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. CejaNevada Supreme Court · 1931
- Peri v. JeffersNevada Supreme Court · 1930
- Martin v. DellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Iowa Mining Co. v. Bonanza Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Devincenzi's EstateNevada Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. PinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Taylor v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1938
- Chance v. ArculariusNevada Supreme Court · 1951
- First National Bank of Nevada v. MosconiNevada Supreme Court · 1948