Legal Opinion
Bruchas v. Preventive Care, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 3, 1996No. C6-96-602PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
This appeal is from a district court’s decision granting JNOV in favor of respondent on appellant’s claims for negligent retention and negligent supervision. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Preventive Care, Inc. (PCI), employed appellant Mary Bruchas as a telephone salesperson. In December 1993, appellant received a written notice warning her that her job performance was not satisfactory. PCI terminated appellant because her productivity failed to increase after receiving the warning.
Following her termination, appellant filed a complaint against PCI and defendants AVT Rubber…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lamb v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Edgewater Motels, Inc. v. GatzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Semrad v. Edina Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Piper Jaffray Companies, Inc. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Estate of Harris v. Papa John's PizzaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Smith v. DataCard Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.