Legal Opinion

Merton Shapiro v. Paramount Film Distributing Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 11, 1960No. 13074PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In this private treble damage action under the federal anti-trust laws, among other things, the defendants pleaded the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense. On October 5, 1959, in its pretrial order, the district court held that the Pennsylvania six year statute of limitations, 12 P.S. § 31, for actions on the case applied to all defendants except Fox Philadelphia Building, Inc. The court further said that: “This order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for a difference of opinion and an immediate appeal from the order may materially…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Bluefields S. S. Co. v. United Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. Musser Forests, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. County Theatre Co. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Allegheny City v. McClurkan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. KatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Conard v. StitzelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Englander Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  5. Harter v. GAF Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API