Legal Opinion

March v. Barnet

California Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1897No. S. F. No. 704Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, Santa Cruz County; J. H. Logan, Judge. Action by William F. March against S. Barnet and others. From a judgment in favor of certain of the defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

Action to recover $1,400 and interest for the alleged wrongful taking and sale of certain personal property of the plaintiff. Judgment of dismissal was entered as to C. S. Laumeister, one of the defendants. Final judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defend*864ant Jacob Steen for $943.41 and costs, and in favor of the deféndants S. Barnet, I. Blum, Joseph Blum and J. H. Jacobs for their costs of suit. Plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment as is in favor of said defendants Bar-net, Blum, Blum and Jacobs. The cause was tried by the court, without a jury, and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. March v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API