Legal Opinion

In Re Hudson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 2006No. A112494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SWAGER, J.

Appellant, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (Department), appeals the order granting Davey Wayne Hudson’s habeas corpus petition. The order invalidated a special condition of Hudson’s parole that prohibited him from possessing or having access to computers, the Internet, or camera equipment absent permission from the Department of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO). The superior court granted the petition, finding the condition both unreasonable and overbroad.

The Department argues that the petition should not have been heard because Hudson failed to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nicanor-Romero v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Kevin R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. In re DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. In Re Electric Refund CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API