Legal Opinion
Nicanor-Romero v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 2008No. 03-73564PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
In 1990, a jury convicted Arturo Nica-nor-Romero of a violation of California Penal Code § 647.6(a). At the time of his conviction, § 647.6(a) provided, “Every person who annoys or molests any child under the age of 18 shall be punished by a fine ..., by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment.” It has been changed in immaterial respects since Nicanor-Romero’s conviction. A violation of § 647.6(a) is a misdemeanor.
The government now seeks to remove Nicanor-Romero to Mexico, based on his § 647.6(a)…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Marmolejo-Campos v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Tijani v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Humphries v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.