Legal Opinion

McSwain v. Craycroft

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1917No. S. F. No. 8178. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Geo. E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an appeal by Susie McSwain, as the administratrix of the estate of Walter S. McSwain, and also as the widow and heir at law of said deceased, from an order made by the superior court in the course of administration of said estate, directing the payment by said administratrix out of the funds of said estate of the sum of $125 each month for the maintenance, education, and support of Annie I. McSwain, during her minority or until the said administration was closed.

Walter S. McSwain died intestate on December 6, 1915, leaving surviving as his only heirs at law his widow, Susie McSwain,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Weber v. ShortSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Estate of WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Hills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In Re Estate of GregoryAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API