Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Gray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1938No. 27402PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This case involves the construction of a contract providing for the extension of the term of an oil and gas lease under certain conditions. In order that there may be a clear understanding of the facts and the contract, we attach a plat of the lease. (Plat is shown on following page.) ;

The controversy arose in the following manner: On July 25, 1916, C. E. Sullivan executed an oil and gas lease to the Carter Oil Company covering 100 acres which he owned, 80 acres of which was a tract comprising the north half of a quarter section, and the other 20 acres consisted of a contiguous 10-acre tract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Superior Oil & Gas Co. v. MehlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Hammett Oil Co. v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Paraffine Oil Co. v. CruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Continental Supply Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Husky Ventures, Inc. v. B55 Invs., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Meeks v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Colonial Royalties Co. v. KeenerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Kelso v. KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Iskian v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API