Lautman v. Pepin
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Lake Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
Appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for malicious prosecution.
The assignments of error are: “(1) The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial; (2) the first paragraph of complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (3) the second paragraph of complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (4) the third paragraph of complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (5) the fourth paragraph of complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (6) the court erred in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Western Assurance Co. v. McAlpinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Miller v. DillIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Helwig v. BecknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Indiana Bicycle Co. v. WillisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. NormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Johnson v. ZimmermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Central Union Telephone Co. v. SokolaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Schultz v. KeelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.