Legal Opinion

Henn v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1954No. 33085PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Schaefer

The issue in this case is whether the claimant, William Hopkins, was an employee or an independent contractor at the time he was injured. If he was an employee, he is entitled to an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act; if he was an independent contractor, he is not. After a hearing, an arbitrator of the Industrial Commission found that he was not an employee and dismissed his application for adjustment of claim for want of jurisdiction. On review, the commission set aside the decision of the arbitrator and awarded compensation for medical and surgical treatment, for temporary total…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Bristol & Gale Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Henry v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Besse v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ceisel v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. Morgan Cab Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Union Starch v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Gunterberg v. B. & M. TRANSPORTATION CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Clark v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API