Legal Opinion

Sandler v. Scullen

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The mortgage note for $11,500, dated February 6, 1928, upon which a finding was made against the defendants Smith and Arnold, was a renewal of a larger note given to the plaintiff for a loan made to Smith. Both notes were signed as maker by one Scullen, a “straw” of no financial ability, who worked for Smith and signed the notes at the request of Smith without receiving any *107consideration. The finding was justified that Scullen signed the note in question, as well as the earlier one, for the accommodation of Smith. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 107, § 52. Smith and Arnold indorsed the note in question…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Orient InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Palmer v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. National Bank of the Republic v. DelanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Quimby v. VarnumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Fourth National Bank v. MeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Collins v. CurtinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Kennedy v. InnisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Melvin Gelman v. Public National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API