Sandler v. Scullen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The mortgage note for $11,500, dated February 6, 1928, upon which a finding was made against the defendants Smith and Arnold, was a renewal of a larger note given to the plaintiff for a loan made to Smith. Both notes were signed as maker by one Scullen, a “straw” of no financial ability, who worked for Smith and signed the notes at the request of Smith without receiving any *107consideration. The finding was justified that Scullen signed the note in question, as well as the earlier one, for the accommodation of Smith. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 107, § 52. Smith and Arnold indorsed the note in question…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Friedman v. Orient InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Palmer v. SawyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- National Bank of the Republic v. DelanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Quimby v. VarnumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Fourth National Bank v. MeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collins v. CurtinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Kennedy v. InnisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Melvin Gelman v. Public National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967