Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Orient Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 29, 1932PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of contract to recover for the theft of an automobile under an insurance policy insuring against such theft. The declaration alleged issuance of the policy, a copy of which is annexed, theft of the automobile, compliance by the plaintiff with the terms of the policy, demand by the plaintiff for payment and refusal by the defendant. Waiver of compliance with the terms of the policy was not alleged. The answer was a general denial.
At the trial it was admitted that the policy in question, which was in evidence, was a valid policy issued by the defendant. There was evidence that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Everson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- McCarthy v. RendleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Greenough v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Shapiro v. Security InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sheehan v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Phillips v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Segal v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Depot Cafe Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Niagara Fire Insurance v. Lowell Trucking Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.