Halm v. Madison
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered March 4, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for personal injuries received from the bite of a dog.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— The respondent, a minor, brought this action against the appellants to recover for injuries received from the bite of a dog, owned and lcept by the appellants. He recovered in the court below, on a trial had before the court sitting without a jury, and this appeal followed.
The only error assigned is that the findings and judgment of the court are contrary to the weight of the evidence. It is contended that the evidence did not justify the findings of the court to the effect that the dog was vicious, and that the defendants knew of its vicious propensities. But as we read the record, the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Swain v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Perazzo v. OrtegaArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Perazzo v. OrtegaArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Mallard v. ZinkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mallard v. ZinkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.