Legal Opinion
Perazzo v. Ortega
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1925No. Civil No. 2401PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— Jose Ortega, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit for damages against Paola Perazzo, hereinafter called defendant, alleging substantially as follows:
“That on and before the 28th day of April, 1924, the defendant owned and kept a vicious black dog, well knowing him to be of vicious and mischievous disposition, and accustomed to worry domestic animals and attack and bite mankind; that on said date while plaintiff was lawfully proceeding . . . upon the Tempe road, a public highway, riding upon his bicycle, the said vicious black dog of defendant ran from under the fence of the yard of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Twigg v. RylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Ayers v. MacOughtrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Cockerham v. . NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stallcup v. RathbunArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Vigue v. NoyesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Flieger v. ReebCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Perazzo v. OrtegaArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Arizona Livestock Co. v. WashingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.