Legal Opinion

Perazzo v. Ortega

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1925No. Civil No. 2401PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— Jose Ortega, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit for damages against Paola Perazzo, hereinafter called defendant, alleging substantially as follows:

“That on and before the 28th day of April, 1924, the defendant owned and kept a vicious black dog, well knowing him to be of vicious and mischievous disposition, and accustomed to worry domestic animals and attack and bite mankind; that on said date while plaintiff was lawfully proceeding . . . upon the Tempe road, a public highway, riding upon his bicycle, the said vicious black dog of defendant ran from under the fence of the yard of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Blue Bar Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Twigg v. RylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Ayers v. MacOughtrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Cockerham v. . NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stallcup v. RathbunArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Vigue v. NoyesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Flieger v. ReebCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Perazzo v. OrtegaArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Arizona Livestock Co. v. WashingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API