Legal Opinion
Mallard v. Zink
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 1979No. 3892Published
1Opinion of the Court
607 P.2d 632 (1979)
94 N.M. 94
John Daniel MALLARD, an Infant by Richard C. Mallard and Jeanne Mallard, his natural parents and guardians, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
L.W. ZINK and Mrs. L.W. Zink, his wife, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 3892.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
September 11, 1979.
Certiorari Granted October 29, 1979.
S. Thomas Overstreet, P.C., Alamogordo, for plaintiffs-appellants.
George D. Maxwell, Durrett, Conway, O'Reilly & Jordon, P.C., Alamogordo, for defendants-appellees.
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
This is a "dog bite" case in which John Daniel Mallard, almost three years of age, was attacked by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Jewell v. SeidenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Skyhook Corp. v. JasperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Alton Harris and United States of America v. Angie Quinones, and Wesco Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.