Legal Opinion
In re Horoshko
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 22, 1996PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, Valentine N. Horoshko, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York as Valentine Nicholas *340Horoshko by the Second Judicial Department on December 18, 1967. At all times relevant herein, Horoshko has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee moves for an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i), immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law until further order of the Court, due to his willful failure to cooperate with the Committee in its…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re ValdesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re LubellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
4Cited by16 opinions
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.