Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1945No. Docket No. 40, Calendar No. 42,902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is a hill of complaint to construe a deed and to confirm plaintiff’s right in a one-fourth interest in certain real property. Defendant hy cross bill seeks to have the deed construed so as to exclude plaintiff from such interest and to confirm his right to the entire property, as the survivor in a joint tenancy. The sole question for decision is whether a certain deed creates a tenancy in common, or a joint tenancy with the right of survivorship.

Esther) M. Taylor, a widow, residing in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, was the owner in fee simple of certain real estate in Iron Mountain, Dickinson…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Overheiser v. . LackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. French v. . CarhartNew York Court of Appeals · 1847
  3. Scott v. GrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hoyt v. WinstanleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Scott-Douglas Corp. v. Greyhound Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Hoit v. RankinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Sack v. TomlinNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. BotsfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API