Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Winstanley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1922No. Docket No. 10PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This bill is filed under section 12897, 3 Comp. Laws 1915, to determine the rights and equities of a judgment debtor in lands sold to satisfy an execution. On the 4th day of December, 1916, Alfred F. Wilcox recovered a judgment on a note against defendant Jasper Winstanley in the sum of $645.56 damages and costs. On the 15th of May, 1913, Mary M. Wilcox sold and conveyed a vacant lot in the city of Detroit to Jasper Winstanley and Elizabeth J. Winstanley, his wife, as joint tenants. To satisfy the execution issued on his judgment against Jasper Winstanley, Mr. Wilcox levied on this property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pray v. StebbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  2. Jacobs v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. In re the Appeal of LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hoag v. HoagMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Cincinnati InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Budwit v. HerrMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Kolker v. GornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. DeYoung v. MeslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API