Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Cottle Construction Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1960No. 6728PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

The claimant, being dissatisfied with a judgment limiting workman’s compensation payments for temporary total disability during the healing period of an injured scheduled member to eighteen months and 25% partial permanent disability to the scheduled member thereafter, and refusal to grant attorneys fees, appeals from a judgment rendered by the court trying the case without a jury.

The facts, so far as pertinent to the decision, are that R. C. Rhodes, the claimant, was 62 years of age at the time of trial, is a carpenter by trade and knows no other trade or means of livelihood.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Perez v. Fred Harvey, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Grant v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hamilton v. DotyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Allen v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hales v. Van CleaveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Quintana v. Trotz Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Romero v. H. A. Lott, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Boggs v. D & L CONSTRUCTION COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API