Grant v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah; W. N. Gatens, Judge. In Banc. The State Industrial Accident Commission refused to make an award to C. Grant for an alleged permanent partial disability and he appealed to the Circuit Court; not being satisfied with the result of the trial in the Circuit Court, the commission appealed to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.
The questions presented are: (1) Was the appeal to the Circuit Court taken within time? And (2): Is Grant entitled to compensation for permanent partial disability notwithstanding his refusal to -submit to an operation?
It is necessary first to give a history of the case. Grant was employed by the Columbia Shipbuilding-Corporation as a riveter and as such employee was subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Law. While Grant was at work on September 23,1919, a plank gave away causing his left knee to strike against a piece of steel, thus producing what was finally determined to be a floating…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Brien v. Albert A. Albrecht Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Kricinovich v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Jendrus v. Detroit Steel Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Lesh v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Floccher's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stark v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Farrin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Herzog v. MittlemanOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.