Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Beede v. Funck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 1941No. 32,979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

This matter is here on our alternative writ of prohibition staying further proceedings pending below.

The action seeks recovery of the balance due on a conditional sale contract. It was begun August 7, 1939. For default of answer, judgment was entered against defendant. But, upon order to show cause, that judgment ivas set aside for lack of jurisdiction. Later, on motion and order, October 9, 1939, the summons and complaint were set aside and the action dismissed. The proof of service averred personal service, and defendant showed that he had never been personally served.

Such…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People's Ice Co. v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. McCormick v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  3. State Ex Rel. Minnesota National Bank v. District Court Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Rishmiller v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Picciano v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mitzel v. SchatzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Marine v. WhippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Favorite v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. State Ex Rel. Ryan v. CahillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Elsen v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API