Legal Opinion

Bohls v. Brazelton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1960No. 10760PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by appellees, Bill Brazelton, J. M. Cowan and U. O. Andrews against Everett D. Bohls, for the recovery of a real estate brokerage commission alleged to be due by virtue of appellees’ efforts in procuring a purchaser of property sold by appellant.

The trial was to a jury, which found in answers to special issues that appellees were doing business together under the name of U. O. Andrews and that U. O. Andrews authorized Bill Brazelton to show the property in question; that the listing was not for a 90-day time period; that the listing agreement dated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Callahan v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Poole v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Central Nat. Bank of San Angelo v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Enfield Realty & Home Bldg. Co. v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. West v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Kaufhold v. Curtis and EwingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. H2ECO Bulk, LLC v. Bill Brinkmeyer and Sheri Brinkmeyer, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  4. Texan Pearl, LLC v. Victoria Koegel, Joseph W. Koegel, Sarah Evans, and Thomas Evans, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API