Legal Opinion

Kaufhold v. Curtis and Ewing

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 25, 1977No. 16873PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

The partnership of Curtis & Ewing brought this action to recover a real estate commission from the seller of two tracts of land, Dr. Joseph Kaufhold, Jr. A jury trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the realtors. Dr. Kaufhold complains that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because 1) Curtis & Ewing “failed to plead and prove that it was a licensed real estate broker”, 2) the alleged agreements had expired of their own terms long prior to any sale, and 3) the alleged 1966 agreement was superseded by the alleged 1967…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagner v. FosterTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Willeke v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Goldring v. GoldringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Ed Hoffman Motors v. GFC CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Reinke v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scalise v. McCallum, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API