Fengar v. Brown
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover possession of real estate; brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New London County, and tried to the jury before Deming, J. Verdict for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendants. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeardsley, J.
This is an action to recover possession of real estate in New London. The case was tried to a jury before the Court of Common Pleas for New London County. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and the defendants appeal.
The defendants’ first answer was a denial of the allegations of the complaint; the second was as follows:
1. That on or about' the first day of September, 1872, the plaintiff agreed with the defendant, Louisa Brown, to allow her the use and possession of the premises described in the plaintiff’s complaint, during her lifetime, on consideration that she should care for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lillibridge v. BarberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Waldo v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Cooke v. United Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
- Rosenthal v. PrustmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1921