Rosenthal v. Prustman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*847S. s. ROSENTHAL VS. <}. f. PRUTSMAN, Appellant.
No. 8392,
CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE, JUDGE.
This is a suit by a lessor against the lessee for can-callation of a lease for making another use of the property than that specified -oa- the lease.
Petitioner alleges that by an act under private signature he leased to the defendant Prutsman the upper duplex apartment No. 8838 St. Charles Avenue; that by said lease it was provided that «
"the premises herein leased are to be used for the following purposes, Dwelling x x x; Lessee is obligated to make no x xjx use of the leased premises for a purpose other,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reiling v. RussellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Fidelity Etc. Co. v. West. Penn. Etc. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Sieward v. DenechaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Pierce v. HeddenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Fengar v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889