Legal Opinion

People v. Bonilla

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1931No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The defendant was charged with having murdered his wife. He was tried before a jury and found guilty of murder in the second degree. This appeal is from the judgment and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

It is contended that the evidence is not sufficient to support the verdict. Appellant, however, mainly relies upon the contention that the court committed prejudicial error in admitting certain extrajudicial statements made by the defendant, for the reason that the corpus deliciti was never proved.

The following facts appear from the evidence: The defendant lived with his wife,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. People v. SimonsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. IvesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. People v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. MisquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API