Legal Opinion

People v. Wright

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1914No. Crim. No. 1783PublishedCited by 53 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Defendant was charged with murder in causing the death of Hattie F. Brown by means of a criminal abortion performed by him upon the body of Hattie F. Brown, from which operation her death resulted. He was convicted of murder in the second degree and from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial he appeals.

The first contention upon the appeal is that the corpus delicti was not proven. The state established that the deceased, a married woman living with her husband, was with child. She was unwilling to bear this child and so told her sister-in-law, an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Solander v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
  2. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
  3. State v. DickinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  4. State v. PowerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. AlcaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API