Legal Opinion

Raisch v. Myers

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1946No. S. F. 17099Published

1Opinion of the Court

27 Cal.2d 773 (1946)

A. G. RAISCH, Plaintiff,

v.

ALMA M. MYERS, Respondent; FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellant.

S. F. No. 17099.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Mar. 26, 1946.

Henry F. Wrigley for Appellant.

Alma M. Myers, in pro. per., for Respondent.

SPENCE, J.

Plaintiff brought an action to foreclose the lien of a street assessment issued in 1939 for work performed under the San Francisco Street Improvement Ordinance of 1934. Defendant Myers is the owner of the real property assessed. Defendant Federal Construction Company, by way of answer and cross-complaint, asked the court to declare a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Larsen v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Rafferty v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kelso v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API