Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Fineman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1993No. 2120 and 2306PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:

Before us are cross-appeals from the granting of summary judgment below. The appeals arise out of a recently instituted program, implemented for the purpose of reducing the case backlog on the overburdened civil docket of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. Commonly referred to as the Judge Pro Tem Program, the system has been variously described and reported upon by the Legal Intelligencer, Philadelphia County’s daily legal newspaper. Essentially, the program employs experienced litigators to preside over civil jury cases. Upon disposition, either by jury…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Nenna & Frain, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Carns v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Incollingo v. MaurerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kituskie v. CorbmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Tohan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Gallagher v. SheridanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Myers v. Kim, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County2001
  5. Ray v. Armstrong DevelopersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API