Legal Opinion

Ray v. Armstrong Developers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, Judge.

Appellants come before us challenging an order entered below purporting to grant a nonsuit in favor of appellee. Said order was entered in response to appellee’s motion for summary judgment. Regardless of whether we characterize the resolution below as non-suit or summary judgment, our review reveals error compelling us to vacate the order below and remand for trial.

The underlying action below was one for personal injuries which resulted when appellant Lea May Ray inadvertently walked headfirst into a clear glass wall on appellee’s premises. Appellant Lea May Ray allegedly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cagnoli v. BonnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Ruhe v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Gallagher v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Moscatiello Construction Co. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Sterling v. FinemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. United Hospitals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API