Legal Opinion

Kituskie v. Corbman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 1996No. 00149PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

Scott Corbman, Esquire, (“Corbman”) and the law firm of Garfinkle, Corbman, Greenberg and Jurikson, P.C. (“Garfinkle firm”) appeal from the judgment of the trial court following a $2,300,000 jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee Leo J. Kituskie, D.M.D. (“Kituskie”) and against appellants.

*469Corbman is an attorney licensed to practice in Pennsylvania; he was a principal/shareholder in the Garfinkle firm, which has its principal place of business in Philadelphia, PA.

Kituskie is a practicing periodontist and a Pennsylvania resident.

On September 3,1989 Kituskie suffered personal…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Rorrer v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Jourdain v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Visvardis v. Eric P. Ferleger, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API