Legal Opinion
Bank Julius Baer & Co. v. Waxfield Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 13, 2005No. Docket No. 04-6668-CVPublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns the interaction between a broad agreement between the parties to arbitrate their disputes and a series of later-enacted agreements that one party asserts vitiate that understanding. Appellant Bank Julius Baer & Co., Ltd. appeals from an interlocutory order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Hellerstein, J., refusing to stay the cross-claims of appellee Wax-field, Ltd. The district court concluded that merger and forum selection clauses contained in a series of contracts superseded broad agreement-to-arbitrate…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Manley v. Ambase Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. v. BelandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Holick v. Cellular Sales of New York, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Applied Energetics, Inc. v. NewOak Capital Markets, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. City of RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. Golden Empire Schools Financing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.