Legal Opinion
Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Lee
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 13, 1933No. 301PublishedCited by 195 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
Chapter 15624 of the laws of Florida, 1931, declares it unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, association, or copartnership, foreign or domestic, to operate any store within the State without first having obtained a license, designates the officer to whom application shall be made, regulates the procedure for issuance of licenses, and provides for annual renewal. The act requires the payment of a filing fee, and by § 5, which is copied in the margin,* *529fixes the amount of the license fee. A tax greater than that exacted for a single store is fixed for each store in excess of one, but not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Iowa-Des Moines National Bank v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by195 opinions
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
190 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.