Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Kadinger

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1953No. File 9371PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

Following our decision in City of Sioux Falls v. Kadinger, 74 S.D. 217, 50 N.W.2d 797, the city commission. enacted an amended ordinance omitting therefrom that provision requiring that an applicant for a plumber’s li*88cense must establish by the affidavit of a master or journeyman plumber that he has served at least three years1 as an apprentice. We held in the prior case that the portion of the ordinance requiring that the applicant for a license shall have served at least three years as an apprentice plumber was unconstitutional and because of this the entire ordinance was invalid.

Appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. StarkMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. DoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  4. City of La Crosse v. ElbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Mundell v. GraphSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grant v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. City of Rapid City v. RenschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Norwood v. ParenteauSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. City of Winner v. LinebackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  5. City of Rapid City v. SchmittSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API