City of Rapid City v. Schmitt
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P. J.
The trial court held invalid a Rapid City ordinance relating to plumbing and plumbers. The city has appealed.
So far as here material the provisions of this ordinance are as follows: A journeyman plumber “is any person who by his knowledge, training, and experience is qualified and capable of doing plumbing.” A plumbing contractor or master plumber “is any person engaged in, or responsible for, the installation of plumbing.” The ordinance then provides that no person shall work as a journeyman plumber, plumbing contractor or master plumber unless licensed under the provisions of the ordinance.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Rountree Corp. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- City of Sioux Falls v. KadingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Sioux Falls v. KadingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962