Legal Opinion

City of Rapid City v. Schmitt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1955No. File 9505PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P. J.

The trial court held invalid a Rapid City ordinance relating to plumbing and plumbers. The city has appealed.

So far as here material the provisions of this ordinance are as follows: A journeyman plumber “is any person who by his knowledge, training, and experience is qualified and capable of doing plumbing.” A plumbing contractor or master plumber “is any person engaged in, or responsible for, the installation of plumbing.” The ordinance then provides that no person shall work as a journeyman plumber, plumbing contractor or master plumber unless licensed under the provisions of the ordinance.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Rountree Corp. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  3. City of Sioux Falls v. KadingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. City of Sioux Falls v. KadingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. NussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API