Legal Opinion

Doe v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2017No. D069411PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, Acting P. J.

—Plaintiffs John and Jane Doe appeal from an order granting the State of California Department of Justice’s 1 special motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civ. Proc., § 425.16). 2 In their lawsuit, the Does allege civil rights violations (Civ. Code, § 52.1; Bane Act), negligence, false/wrongful arrest, defamation, and loss of consortium against the State and the City and County of San Diego. Over many years, State agents allegedly caused John Doe to register as a sex offender through threats of enforcement, maintained him on California’s sex…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Scalia v. Cnty. of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  2. Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. (PC) Hearns v. GonzalesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. (PS) Gifford v. Hornbrook Fire Protection DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Animal Protection and Rescue etc. v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API