Legal Opinion

Hoenecke v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 1, 1949No. C. D. 1154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

A quantity of scoured wool, consisting of 420 bales, was imported at Minneapolis, Minn., and upon entry was classified and assessed for duty under paragraph 1102 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 37 cents per pound on the clean content thereof. There is no dispute as to the classification of the wool, the importer's contention being that duty was assessed upon the basis of too great a quantity as “clean content.” The Government computed the duty upon a clean content of 99.5 per centum, whereas the importer claims the proper percentages are 94% per centum to 96% per centum as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. BracherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armour v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. F. Strauss & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API