Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 17, 1926No. 2656PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The merchandise involved in this suit was entered January 17, 1923, and consisted of wool on the skin in the grease. It is admittedly subject to a duty at 30 cents per pound on the clean content, under the provisions of paragraph 1102 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which roads:

Par. 1102. Wools,-not specially provided for, and hair of the Angora goat, Cashmere goat, alpaca, and other like animals, imported in the grease or washed, 31 cents per pound of clean content; imported in the scoured state, 31 cents per pound; imported on the skin, 30 cents per pound of clean content.

Paragraph 1104 of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Gump Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Wilkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899
  5. Lunham v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fred Whitaker Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Rothschild v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. Golding Bros. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API