Legal Opinion
S-Y-G
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3575PublishedCited by 311 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 247
(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3575 In re S-Y-G-, Applicant Decided August 2, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals In her motion to reopen proceedings to pursue her asylum claim, the applicant did not meet the heavy burden to show that her proffered evidence is material and reflects “changed circumstances arising in the country of nationality” to support the motion where the documents submitted reflect general birth planning policies in her home province that do not specifically show any likelihood that she or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wei Guang Wang v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Jian Hui Shao v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- M-E-V-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
- H-L-H- & Z-Y-ZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2010
- Zhi Yun Gao v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- M-F-W- & L-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.