Legal Opinion

Chore-Time Equipment, Inc. v. Automatic Poultry Feeder Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 12, 1965No. 4853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, District Judge.

Defendants have moved for a partial summary judgment under the following set of facts:

Plaintiff holds Patent No. 3,033,163 for a type of automatic poultry feeder. It applied for and received a reissue patent, No. 25,589. The reissue patent is substantially similar to the original patent, with the exception of claims 8, 9 and 10, which are not present in the original patent.

Defendants claim that inasmuch as the present suit concerns infringement of claims 8, 9 and 10, of the reissue patent, it should be dismissed by summary judgment under the rule of 35 U.S.C. § 251,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Avco Manufacturing Corporation and the Harry Alter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  3. Michigan Cent. R. v. Consolidated Car-Heating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  4. John W. England v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  5. Krauth v. Autographic Register Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wayne-Gossard Corp. v. Sondra, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API