Chore-Time Equipment, Inc. v. Automatic Poultry Feeder Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for a partial summary judgment under the following set of facts:
Plaintiff holds Patent No. 3,033,163 for a type of automatic poultry feeder. It applied for and received a reissue patent, No. 25,589. The reissue patent is substantially similar to the original patent, with the exception of claims 8, 9 and 10, which are not present in the original patent.
Defendants claim that inasmuch as the present suit concerns infringement of claims 8, 9 and 10, of the reissue patent, it should be dismissed by summary judgment under the rule of 35 U.S.C. § 251,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Avco Manufacturing Corporation and the Harry Alter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Michigan Cent. R. v. Consolidated Car-Heating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- John W. England v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Krauth v. Autographic Register Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wayne-Gossard Corp. v. Sondra, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977