Legal Opinion

Krauth v. Autographic Register Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 18, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Albert Krauth and another against the Auto-graphic Register Company and another to restrain the infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit brought by the plaintiffs against defendants for the infringement of claims 6, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of letters patent No. 14,189, reissued to Albert Krauth, August 29, 1916, on application filed May 1, 1916. One-half interest in this patent was on .September 27, 1916, assigned to Christian Benninghofen, the other plaintiff. The original patent, No. 1,122,508, was issued to Albert Krauth, December 29, 1914. In this reissue patent, the first 10 claims were contained In the original patent, and the rest 'of the claims, 11 — 17, are new.

The invention relates…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. William R. Thropp & Sons Co. v. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Jeffrey-De Witt Insulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Alliance Securities Co. v. J. A. Mohr & SonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
  3. General Refractories Co. v. AshLand Fire Brick Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1926
  4. Drumhead Co. of America v. HammondDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Pearson v. Washingtonian Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API