Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia R. Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 1954No. Civ. A. 10218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

This is a claim for money damages which arose out of an accident in which the plaintiff employee was involved on December 14, 1951. The action was premised on two separate causes of action: One under the Safety Appliance Act and the other under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, either of which if established by the weight or preponderance of the credible evidence would entitle the employee to recover. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq.; 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq.

The proceeding was tried by a jury. By special interrogatories the jury determined that the defendant violated the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Myers v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Lathem v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  5. Foresman v. PepinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  2. Robert L. Spillers v. Tri-State Glass Lined Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. Robert L. Spillers v. Tri-State Glass Lined Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API