Legal Opinion

Lathem v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1939No. 27449PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation ease. Mrs. Roy E. Lathem filed a claim against Davis-Washington Company and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company. The director made the following finding; “That the deceased Roy E. Lathem had a pre-existing interior deformity, (b) That he suffered a strain which set up a condition resulting in his death, (c) That the strain suffered by the deceased was sustained while he was working for Davis-Washington Company, and that it arose out of and in the course of his employment, (d) That notice of the claim of accident was given to Davis-Washington Company within…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Omberg v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. Riley v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Shaughnessy v. HoltIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hammond v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Argonaut Insurance v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Lassiter v. PossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Hodges v. Effingham County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API