Legal Opinion

Laborers' Pension Fund v. Litgen Concrete Cutting & Coring Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 22, 1989No. 88 C 8531PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.

Judicial development of the law is usually slow. There are a number of reasons for this: some types of disputes do not arise as frequently as others; similar types of disputes will encompass different facts, allowing for different modes of disposition. A statute of limitations can bar claims raised in one suit, but not the other; parties' differing assessments as to the merits of their case can result in early settlement for one case and trial for the other.

Against this backdrop, the dispute presently before this court affords it a unique…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Anderson v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Linear Films, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
  2. Navarre v. Luna (In Re Luna)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger DhimantecDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Laborers' Pension Fund v. Litgen Concrete Cutting & Coring Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Charter Services, Inc. v. Dl Air, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API