Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Abbott
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 3, 1944No. 3PublishedCited by 221 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
The primary question in this case is whether on these facts shareholders of a bank-stock holding company are liable under § 23 of the Federal Reserve Act, 12 U. S. C. *352§ 64, and § 12 of the National Bank Act, 12 U. S. C. § 63, for an assessment on shares of a national bank in the portfolio of the holding company.
The essential facts1 may be briefly stated.
BancoKentueky Company was organized under the laws of Delaware in July, 1929. It had broad charter powers in the field of finance. It was organized by the management of the National Bank of Kentucky and of the Louisville Trust Company—banking…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by221 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De CubaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.