Legal Opinion

Fiumara v. President & Fellows of Harvard College

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 1, 2009No. 08-1129PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRIS, Circuit Judge.

The record satisfies us that there is no genuine issue of material fact for trial. We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Okmyansky v. Herbalife Int’l of America, Inc., 415 F.3d 154, 158 (1st Cir. 2005).

Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

It is the plaintiffs burden to show that material questions of fact exist. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 324, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). To do so in this matter, the plaintiff must show that he (1) is statutorily impaired under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (2000),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Abramian v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Criado v. IBM CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Russell v. Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Phelps v. Optima Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Delgado-Echevarria v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LPCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. Chan v. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2015
  3. Bader v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  4. Tarbell v. Rocky's Ace HardwareDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Ellis v. North Andover Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API