Legal Opinion
Criado v. IBM Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 5, 1998No. 97-1341, 97-1342PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.
The defendant IBM Corporation appeals from a final judgment in favor of plaintiff Elizabeth Criado on her claim that her employment with IBM was terminated in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112; and the Puerto Rico Indemnity Law, 29 L.P.R.A. § 185a-d. IBM questions the sufficiency of the evidence in numerous respects. By cross-appeal Cria-do questions elements of the damage award in her favor. 1
I. Factual and Procedural History
The jury was entitled to find the following facts, either as undisputed or based on sufficient…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert E. Bultemeyer v. Fort Wayne Community SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Soileau v. Guilford of Maine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Amego, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Higgins v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Marrero v. Goya of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Emily Snead v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation James McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.