Legal Opinion

Magana Cathcart McCarthy v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 2009No. B203777PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KRIEGLER, J.

Without filing a motion for summary judgment or mandatory separate statements of undisputed facts, and for the purpose of creating appellate review of pretrial rulings, the parties to an action in a complex litigation case stipulated that the court would have granted summary judgment based upon its ruling on certain “threshold issues” in favor of defendant. The stipulation also included a dismissal, without prejudice, of class action allegations.

We disapprove of the unauthorized procedure utilized to create appellate review without compliance with the mandatory requirements…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Building Industry Assn. of Southern California, Inc. v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawk Valley, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Fackelman v. MicronixOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Hyundai Securities Co. v. Ik Chi LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Chapman v. Hyundai Motor America CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Magana Cathcart McCarthy v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API