Magana Cathcart McCarthy v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
Without filing a motion for summary judgment or mandatory separate statements of undisputed facts, and for the purpose of creating appellate review of pretrial rulings, the parties to an action in a complex litigation case stipulated that the court would have granted summary judgment based upon its ruling on certain “threshold issues” in favor of defendant. The stipulation also included a dismissal, without prejudice, of class action allegations.
We disapprove of the unauthorized procedure utilized to create appellate review without compliance with the mandatory requirements…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Building Industry Assn. of Southern California, Inc. v. City of CamarilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hawk Valley, Inc. v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Fackelman v. MicronixOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hyundai Securities Co. v. Ik Chi LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Chapman v. Hyundai Motor America CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Magana Cathcart McCarthy v. CB Richard Ellis, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.